Conveners
Military Transformation: Innovation and Strategic Change in the Transatlantic Context
- Magnus Petersson (Stockholm University)
- Magnus Petersson (Stockholm University)
-
Kaija Schilde (Boston University)12/06/2026, 14:20Military TransformationPaper Abstract (Closed Panels)
This paper challenges the conventional assumption that EU political development lacks a bellicist foundation. I argue that external threats have been a necessary condition driving EU integration throughout its history, and that the EU can be understood as a 21st century regulatory security state. Drawing on original archival research from the Jean Monnet archives, I demonstrate that European...
Go to contribution page -
Jordan Becker (United States Military Academy, West Point, Brussels School of Governance, Ecole de Guerre (IHEDN, IRSEM))12/06/2026, 14:30Military TransformationPaper Abstract (Closed Panels)
Following the 2014 Russian invasion of Ukraine and annexation of Crimea, most research examining NATO's response has focused on member state pledges to increase defense spending to at least two percent of GDP. Far less attention has been paid to whether and how NATO members' \textit{military capabilities}--the outputs of defense investment--changed in response to threats from Russia. We...
Go to contribution page -
Mr Dumitru-Catalin Vasile (National School of Political and Administrative Studies, Bucharest, Romania)12/06/2026, 14:40Military TransformationPaper Abstract (Closed Panels)
Modern military strategy is undergoing a paradigm shift, moving away from a "platform-centric" model defined by the capabilities of individual assets such as tanks, fighter jets, and carriers toward a "network-centric" model prioritizing connectivity, data fusion, and multi-domain integration. While the operational necessity of this transition is widely accepted, this paper argues that the...
Go to contribution page -
Vasiliki Plessia Aravani (Diplomatische Academie Wien, University of Vienna)12/06/2026, 14:50Military TransformationPaper Abstract (Closed Panels)
The literature on military diffusion has traditionally treated alliances as transmission paths through which nationally developed military technologies are disseminated among allies. In this view, NATO is exclusively portrayed as a forum for standardization and doctrinal coordination rather than also a site of military innovation. This paper revisits this understanding by examining...
Go to contribution page